Illinois State vs. Oklahoma: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Illinois State

Oklahoma
▸Final
Memorial Stadium (Norman, OK)
ILLITeam statsOU
151Total yards495
34Pass392
117Rush103
8First downs23
1-113rd down4-10
0Turnovers2
27:04Possession32:56
- Q4 4:33OUKeontez Lewis 20 Yd pass from John Mateer (Tate Sandell Kick)3–35
- Q4 14:52OUKeontez Lewis 28 Yd pass from John Mateer (Tate Sandell Kick)3–28
- Q3 6:26ILLIMatt Maldonado 33 Yd Field Goal 3–21
- Q2 0:51OUTory Blaylock 5 Yd Run (Tate Sandell Kick)0–21
- Q2 11:50OUDeion Burks 27 Yd pass from John Mateer (Tate Sandell Kick)0–14
- Q1 0:39OUJohn Mateer 7 Yd Run (Tate Sandell Kick)0–7
How the model called it
Market line
OU −39
Against the number
ILLI covered
line OU −39
What the numbers say
- ILLI played behind the sticks — third downs that long convert rarely, and OU did not face the same ones. 3rd & 9.2 vs 3rd & 6.0
Kickoff136 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
OU (top)ILLI (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: OU 100%
Closing line
OU −39
Closing total
61.0
Model line
—
Actual result
ILLI 3 – 35 OU
Illinois State
- PassTommy Rittenhouse 6/13, 22 YDS
- RushWenkers Wright 7 CAR, 50 YDS
- RecEddie Kasper 1 REC, 10 YDS
Oklahoma
- PassJohn Mateer 30/37, 392 YDS, 3 TD, 1 INT
- RushTory Blaylock 8 CAR, 42 YDS, 1 TD
- RecKeontez Lewis 9 REC, 119 YDS, 2 TD
30.3sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
119
Points / snap
0.32
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsOU up 18 entering the 4th quarter. Across 838 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
97%
OU went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Illinois State vs. Oklahoma?
Illinois State 3, Oklahoma 35.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (OU) was correct.
ILLI
OU
21%
Success rate
49%
-0.44
EPA / pass
0.74
-0.03
EPA / rush
0.15
26%
Early-down success
48%
9%
Pass success
54%
33%
Rush success
42%
4%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
17%
21%
Stuffed rush rate
24%
49%
Pass rate
54%
9.2
Avg 3rd-down distance
6.0
ILLI
9.2 yards to go on 3rd down
47 scrimmage snaps
OU
6.0 yards to go on 3rd down
72 scrimmage snaps
| ILLI | OU | |
|---|---|---|
| 151 | Total yards | 495 |
| 34 | Passing yards | 392 |
| 117 | Rushing yards | 103 |
| 8 | First downs | 23 |
| 1-11 | 3rd down | 4-10 |
| 0-0 | 4th down | 2-3 |
| 10/20 | Comp/Att | 30/37 |
| 1.7 | Yards per pass | 10.6 |
| 4.5 | Yards per rush | 3.2 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 2-10 | Penalties | 6-35 |
| 27:04 | Possession | 32:56 |
ILLI
8/9 with the model
−0.3 pts · −0.0% win prob
OU
5/5 with the model
nothing given up
Costliest call
Q1 5:43 ILLI punt on 4th & 14 at OU 41. The model preferred field goal, a gap of 0.30 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishILLI 1/11 scoring drives← own end zone →OU 5/11 scoring drives
OUPUNT3 pl, 7 yds· own 25Q1
ILLIPUNT6 pl, 24 yds· own 14Q1
OUFUM3 pl, 23 yds· own 37Q1
ILLIPUNT4 pl, 19 yds· own 40Q1
OUTD10 pl, 94 yds· own 6Q1
ILLIPUNT7 pl, 21 yds· own 25Q1
OUTD4 pl, 77 yds· own 23Q2
ILLIPUNT5 pl, 17 yds· own 18Q2
OUTD15 pl, 81 yds· own 19Q2
ILLIEND2 pl, 7 yds· own 25Q2
ILLIPUNT5 pl, 24 yds· own 25Q3
OUPUNT3 pl, 3 yds· own 12Q3
ILLIPUNT3 pl, 2 yds· midfieldQ3
OUINT3 pl, 9 yds· own 4Q3
ILLIFG4 pl, 7 yds· opp 22Q3
OUTD12 pl, 77 yds· own 23Q3
ILLIPUNT3 pl, 3 yds· own 25Q4
OUDOWNS6 pl, 24 yds· own 36Q4
ILLIPUNT3 pl, 0 yds· own 40Q4
OUTD8 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q4
ILLIPUNT5 pl, 20 yds· own 25Q4
OUEND2 pl, 3 yds· own 2Q4
- Q4 4:33OUKeontez Lewis 20 Yd pass from John Mateer (Tate Sandell Kick)3–35
- Q4 14:52OUKeontez Lewis 28 Yd pass from John Mateer (Tate Sandell Kick)3–28
- Q3 6:26ILLIMatt Maldonado 33 Yd Field Goal 3–21
- Q2 0:51OUTory Blaylock 5 Yd Run (Tate Sandell Kick)0–21
- Q2 11:50OUDeion Burks 27 Yd pass from John Mateer (Tate Sandell Kick)0–14
- Q1 0:39OUJohn Mateer 7 Yd Run (Tate Sandell Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
