Austin Peay vs. Georgia: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Austin Peay1-0

Georgia1-0
▸Final
Sanford Stadium
AUSTTeam statsUGA
196Total yards421
151Pass231
45Rush190
10First downs26
3-133rd down7-13
1Turnovers2
26:51Possession33:09
- Q4 5:39UGANate Frazier 1 Yd Run (Peyton Woodring Kick)6–28
- Q3 5:51AUSTCarson Smith 43 Yd Field Goal 6–21
- Q3 10:54UGAChauncey Bowens 14 Yd Run (Peyton Woodring Kick)3–21
- Q2 9:08AUSTCarson Smith 44 Yd Field Goal 3–14
- Q2 13:50UGANate Frazier 2 Yd Run (Peyton Woodring Kick)0–14
- Q1 5:55UGAChauncey Bowens 2 Yd Run (Peyton Woodring Kick)0–7
How the model called it
Market line
UGA −46.5
Against the number
AUST covered
line UGA −46.5
Kickoff145 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
UGA (top)AUST (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: UGA 100%
Closing line
UGA −46.5
Closing total
56.0
Model line
—
Actual result
AUST 6 – 28 UGA
Austin Peay
- PassChris Parson 16/23, 151 YDS, 1 INT
- RushCorey Richardson 7 CAR, 33 YDS
- RecKamari Maxwell 3 REC, 41 YDS
Georgia
- PassGunner Stockton 26/34, 227 YDS
- RushNate Frazier 14 CAR, 69 YDS, 2 TD
- RecColbie Young 7 REC, 76 YDS
27.4sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
131
Points / snap
0.26
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsUGA up 15 entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,206 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
95%
UGA went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Austin Peay vs. Georgia?
Austin Peay 6, Georgia 28.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (UGA) was correct.
AUST
UGA
35%
Success rate
60%
-0.13
EPA / pass
0.38
-0.22
EPA / rush
0.20
38%
Early-down success
60%
42%
Pass success
63%
27%
Rush success
56%
6%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
8%
23%
Stuffed rush rate
24%
50%
Pass rate
48%
5.5
Avg 3rd-down distance
5.6
AUST
5.5 yards to go on 3rd down
52 scrimmage snaps
UGA
5.6 yards to go on 3rd down
79 scrimmage snaps
| AUST | UGA | |
|---|---|---|
| 196 | Total yards | 421 |
| 151 | Passing yards | 231 |
| 45 | Rushing yards | 190 |
| 10 | First downs | 26 |
| 3-13 | 3rd down | 7-13 |
| 1-2 | 4th down | 0-0 |
| 16/23 | Comp/Att | 27/36 |
| 6.6 | Yards per pass | 6.4 |
| 1.6 | Yards per rush | 4.8 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 3-10 | Penalties | 3-24 |
| 26:51 | Possession | 33:09 |
AUST
8/9 with the model
−0.8 pts · −0.0% win prob
UGA
2/3 with the model
−0.4 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q1 11:11 AUST punt on 4th & 3 at UGA 46. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.80 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishAUST 2/11 scoring drives← own end zone →UGA 4/11 scoring drives
UGAFUM4 pl, 28 yds· own 25Q1
AUSTPUNT3 pl, 7 yds· own 47Q1
UGATD10 pl, 80 yds· own 20Q1
AUSTPUNT3 pl, -1 yds· own 25Q1
UGATD9 pl, 56 yds· own 44Q1
AUSTFG8 pl, 48 yds· own 25Q2
UGAPUNT3 pl, 6 yds· own 25Q2
AUSTINT4 pl, 10 yds· own 24Q2
UGAPUNT5 pl, 1 yds· opp 39Q2
AUSTPUNT5 pl, 11 yds· own 4Q2
UGAEND10 pl, 53 yds· own 45Q2
AUSTPUNT3 pl, 5 yds· own 25Q3
UGATD7 pl, 60 yds· own 40Q3
AUSTPUNT4 pl, 23 yds· own 25Q3
UGAFUM5 pl, 26 yds· own 5Q3
AUSTFG4 pl, 5 yds· opp 31Q3
UGAPUNT3 pl, 0 yds· own 10Q3
AUSTDOWNS12 pl, 63 yds· own 36Q3
UGATD17 pl, 99 yds· own 1Q4
AUSTPUNT6 pl, 18 yds· own 25Q4
UGAPUNT3 pl, 3 yds· own 20Q4
AUSTEND1 pl, 2 yds· own 35Q4
- Q4 5:39UGANate Frazier 1 Yd Run (Peyton Woodring Kick)6–28
- Q3 5:51AUSTCarson Smith 43 Yd Field Goal 6–21
- Q3 10:54UGAChauncey Bowens 14 Yd Run (Peyton Woodring Kick)3–21
- Q2 9:08AUSTCarson Smith 44 Yd Field Goal 3–14
- Q2 13:50UGANate Frazier 2 Yd Run (Peyton Woodring Kick)0–14
- Q1 5:55UGAChauncey Bowens 2 Yd Run (Peyton Woodring Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
