Lincoln (CA) vs. Tennessee State: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Lincoln (CA)0-7

Tennessee State0-1
▸Final
Nissan Stadium
LINCTeam statsTENN
145Total yards396
93Pass82
52Rush314
13First downs22
7-173rd down4-7
3Turnovers0
35:44Possession24:16
- Q3 0:50TENNDeveon Bryant 14 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–54
- Q3 8:02TENNJordan Gant 6 Yd Run (James Lowery PAT failed)0–47
- Q3 11:48TENNDraylen Ellis 4 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–41
- Q2 1:17TENNJordan Gant 3 Yd Run (Ahmed Mohamed PAT blocked)0–34
- Q2 6:14TENNDelanie Majors 2 Yd pass from Draylen Ellis (James Lowery Kick)0–28
- Q2 13:45TENNJalen Rouse 12 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–21
- Q1 2:21TENNJordan Gant 3 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–14
- Q1 11:08TENNJordan Gant 31 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–7
What the numbers say
- LINC played behind the sticks — third downs that long convert rarely, and TENN did not face the same ones. 3rd & 8.1 vs 3rd & 5.9
Kickoff140 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
TENN (top)LINC (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: TENN 100%
Lincoln (CA)
- PassTJ Goodwin 7/16, 77 YDS, 1 INT
- RushOtis Weah 14 CAR, 46 YDS
- RecTeriq Phillips 2 REC, 42 YDS
Tennessee State
- PassDeveon Bryant 5/7, 54 YDS
- RushJalen Rouse 12 CAR, 93 YDS, 1 TD
- RecJalen Rouse 2 REC, 30 YDS
28.5sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
126
Points / snap
0.43
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsTENN up 54 entering the 4th quarter. Across 57 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
100%
TENN went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Lincoln (CA) vs. Tennessee State?
Lincoln (CA) 0, Tennessee State 54.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (TENN) was correct.
LINC
TENN
36%
Success rate
52%
-0.35
EPA / pass
0.40
-0.04
EPA / rush
0.48
34%
Early-down success
51%
25%
Pass success
47%
45%
Rush success
53%
5%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
12%
29%
Stuffed rush rate
13%
42%
Pass rate
25%
8.1
Avg 3rd-down distance
5.9
LINC
8.1 yards to go on 3rd down
66 scrimmage snaps
TENN
5.9 yards to go on 3rd down
60 scrimmage snaps
| LINC | TENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 145 | Total yards | 396 |
| 93 | Passing yards | 82 |
| 52 | Rushing yards | 314 |
| 13 | First downs | 22 |
| 7-17 | 3rd down | 4-7 |
| 1-3 | 4th down | 0-0 |
| 11/21 | Comp/Att | 9/15 |
| 4.4 | Yards per pass | 5.5 |
| 1.2 | Yards per rush | 7.3 |
| 3 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 8-70 | Penalties | 5-59 |
| 35:44 | Possession | 24:16 |
LINC
7/7 with the model
nothing given up
TENN
1/2 with the model
−1.0 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q1 4:09 TENN punt on 4th & 4 at LINC 39. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.96 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishLINC 0/11 scoring drives← own end zone →TENN 8/11 scoring drives
TENNTD9 pl, 70 yds· own 30Q1
LINCDOWNS9 pl, 32 yds· own 25Q1
TENNPUNT5 pl, 18 yds· own 43Q1
LINCFUM2 pl, 5 yds· own 1Q1
TENNTD4 pl, 14 yds· opp 14Q1
LINCPUNT3 pl, -10 yds· own 25Q1
TENNTD4 pl, 48 yds· opp 48Q1
TENNTD11 pl, 87 yds· own 13Q2
LINCDOWNS9 pl, 29 yds· own 25Q2
TENNTD11 pl, 54 yds· own 46Q2
LINCPUNT3 pl, 4 yds· own 25Q2
LINCEND6 pl, 31 yds· own 27Q2
TENNTD1 pl, 4 yds· opp 4Q3
LINCUncateg6 pl, 1 yds· own 25Q3
LINCINT6 pl, 2 yds· own 16Q3
TENNTD3 pl, 29 yds· opp 29Q3
LINCPUNT6 pl, 10 yds· own 25Q3
TENNTD6 pl, 72 yds· own 28Q3
LINCPUNT13 pl, 39 yds· own 18Q3
TENNPUNT5 pl, 16 yds· own 14Q4
LINCPUNT6 pl, 9 yds· own 39Q4
TENNUncateg1 pl, 0 yds· own 15Q4
- Q3 0:50TENNDeveon Bryant 14 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–54
- Q3 8:02TENNJordan Gant 6 Yd Run (James Lowery PAT failed)0–47
- Q3 11:48TENNDraylen Ellis 4 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–41
- Q2 1:17TENNJordan Gant 3 Yd Run (Ahmed Mohamed PAT blocked)0–34
- Q2 6:14TENNDelanie Majors 2 Yd pass from Draylen Ellis (James Lowery Kick)0–28
- Q2 13:45TENNJalen Rouse 12 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–21
- Q1 2:21TENNJordan Gant 3 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–14
- Q1 11:08TENNJordan Gant 31 Yd Run (James Lowery Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
