Lafayette vs. Duke: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Lafayette

Duke1-0
▸Final
Wallace Wade Stadium
LAFATeam statsDUKE
213Total yards515
87Pass254
126Rush261
14First downs28
4-113rd down5-8
2Turnovers1
27:19Possession32:41
- Q4 13:45DUKEJordan Moore 5 Yd pass from Henry Belin IV (Todd Pelino Kick)7–42
- Q3 1:50DUKEHenry Belin IV 1 Yd Run (Todd Pelino Kick)7–35
- Q3 7:52DUKEJaquez Moore 39 Yd Run (Todd Pelino Kick)7–28
- Q2 1:17DUKEJordan Waters 16 Yd Run (Todd Pelino Kick)7–21
- Q2 12:45DUKEJordan Waters 5 Yd Run (Todd Pelino Kick)7–14
- Q1 4:11LAFAChris Carasia 12 Yd pass from Dean DeNobile (Jack Simonetta Kick)7–7
- Q1 11:31DUKEJalon Calhoun 16 Yd pass from Riley Leonard (Todd Pelino Kick)0–7
How the model called it
Market line
DUKE −41.5
Against the number
LAFA covered
line DUKE −41.5
Kickoff129 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
DUKE (top)LAFA (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: DUKE 100%
Closing line
DUKE −41.5
Closing total
48.5
Model line
—
Actual result
LAFA 7 – 42 DUKE
Lafayette
- PassDean DeNobile 9/17, 87 YDS, 1 TD, 2 INT
- RushJamar Curtis 10 CAR, 40 YDS
- RecElijah Steward 4 REC, 37 YDS
Duke
- PassRiley Leonard 12/12, 136 YDS, 1 TD
- RushJordan Waters 11 CAR, 112 YDS, 2 TD
- RecJordan Moore 4 REC, 84 YDS, 1 TD
30.5sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
117
Points / snap
0.42
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsDUKE up 28 entering the 4th quarter. Across 464 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
99%
DUKE went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Lafayette vs. Duke?
Lafayette 7, Duke 42.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (DUKE) was correct.
LAFA
DUKE
31%
Success rate
61%
0.02
EPA / pass
0.94
-0.08
EPA / rush
0.24
29%
Early-down success
59%
35%
Pass success
78%
29%
Rush success
51%
6%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
20%
19%
Stuffed rush rate
12%
39%
Pass rate
35%
8.1
Avg 3rd-down distance
6.2
LAFA
8.1 yards to go on 3rd down
51 scrimmage snaps
DUKE
6.2 yards to go on 3rd down
66 scrimmage snaps
| LAFA | DUKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 213 | Total yards | 515 |
| 87 | Passing yards | 254 |
| 126 | Rushing yards | 261 |
| 14 | First downs | 28 |
| 4-11 | 3rd down | 5-8 |
| 1-2 | 4th down | 2-3 |
| 9/18 | Comp/Att | 20/21 |
| 4.8 | Yards per pass | 12.1 |
| 3.8 | Yards per rush | 5.8 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 6-74 | Penalties | 4-25 |
| 27:19 | Possession | 32:41 |
LAFA
4/6 with the model
−0.9 pts · −0.0% win prob
DUKE
2/2 with the model
nothing given up
Costliest call
Q1 2:25 LAFA punt on 4th & 3 at DUKE 47. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.65 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishLAFA 1/9 scoring drives← own end zone →DUKE 6/9 scoring drives
DUKETD8 pl, 68 yds· own 32Q1
LAFATD13 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q1
DUKEFUM1 pl, 19 yds· own 35Q1
LAFAPUNT3 pl, 7 yds· own 46Q1
DUKETD9 pl, 70 yds· own 30Q1
LAFADOWNS10 pl, 51 yds· own 25Q2
DUKETD9 pl, 76 yds· own 24Q2
LAFAINT6 pl, 27 yds· own 25Q2
DUKEMISS6 pl, 64 yds· own 25Q2
LAFAPUNT6 pl, 11 yds· own 25Q3
DUKETD8 pl, 84 yds· own 16Q3
LAFAPUNT5 pl, 14 yds· own 14Q3
DUKETD4 pl, 60 yds· own 40Q3
LAFAINT2 pl, 6 yds· own 25Q3
DUKETD5 pl, 53 yds· own 47Q3
LAFAPUNT3 pl, 3 yds· own 25Q4
DUKEDOWNS17 pl, 55 yds· own 33Q4
LAFAEND3 pl, 19 yds· own 12Q4
- Q4 13:45DUKEJordan Moore 5 Yd pass from Henry Belin IV (Todd Pelino Kick)7–42
- Q3 1:50DUKEHenry Belin IV 1 Yd Run (Todd Pelino Kick)7–35
- Q3 7:52DUKEJaquez Moore 39 Yd Run (Todd Pelino Kick)7–28
- Q2 1:17DUKEJordan Waters 16 Yd Run (Todd Pelino Kick)7–21
- Q2 12:45DUKEJordan Waters 5 Yd Run (Todd Pelino Kick)7–14
- Q1 4:11LAFAChris Carasia 12 Yd pass from Dean DeNobile (Jack Simonetta Kick)7–7
- Q1 11:31DUKEJalon Calhoun 16 Yd pass from Riley Leonard (Todd Pelino Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
