Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Louisville change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Stephen F. Austin change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Louisville a 9.6-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Louisville it is +13.0, at Stephen F. Austin +6.2 (from Louisville's side).
- Neutral
- +9.6
- 70.3 poss.
- At Louisville
- +13.0
- 70.3 poss.
- At Stephen F. Austin
- +6.2
- 70.3 poss.
Margins are from Louisville's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Louisville |  Stephen F. Austin |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +21.015 | +7.483 |
| Adjusted offence | 119.213 | 109.5115 |
| Adjusted defence | 98.223 | 102.165 |
| Adjusted tempo | 71.591 | 69.2228 |
| Raw offence | 117.523 | 110.4101 |
| Raw defence | 100.845 | 98.828 |
| Effective FG% | 56.4%20 | 51.7%160 |
| Turnover rate | 16.2%228 | 13.1%24 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 89.4%200 | 123.9%81 |
| Free-throw rate | 33.8%218 | 30.1%306 |
| Opponent eFG% | 48.0%39 | 47.8%34 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 15.8%162 | 16.3%126 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 23.0%95 | -55.0%311 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 32.2%112 | 31.1%88 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 53.2%4 | 39.8%176 |
| Raw tempo | 72.371 | 67.7286 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.