Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Kentucky change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Kentucky a 2.5-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Kentucky it is +5.9, at Tulsa -0.9 (from Kentucky's side).
- Neutral
- +2.5
- 70.3 poss.
- At Kentucky
- +5.9
- 70.3 poss.
- At Tulsa
- -0.9
- 70.3 poss.
Margins are from Kentucky's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Kentucky |  Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +17.127 | +13.543 |
| Adjusted offence | 116.240 | 117.625 |
| Adjusted defence | 99.128 | 104.1110 |
| Adjusted tempo | 69.7198 | 71.0121 |
| Raw offence | 113.955 | 117.619 |
| Raw defence | 104.7112 | 104.098 |
| Effective FG% | 53.3%89 | 55.5%30 |
| Turnover rate | 14.4%97 | 14.6%110 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 98.6%161 | 116.1%101 |
| Free-throw rate | 37.3%124 | 40.9%50 |
| Opponent eFG% | 48.9%61 | 49.5%81 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 14.3%258 | 14.4%249 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 11.4%165 | 3.4%204 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 36.2%218 | 32.1%110 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 39.7%179 | 46.6%37 |
| Raw tempo | 70.9126 | 71.694 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.