Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Colorado change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Tulsa a 4.7-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Colorado it is -1.3, at Tulsa -8.2 (from Colorado's side).
- Neutral
- -4.7
- 70.9 poss.
- At Colorado
- -1.3
- 70.9 poss.
- At Tulsa
- -8.2
- 70.9 poss.
Margins are from Colorado's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Colorado |  Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +6.889 | +13.543 |
| Adjusted offence | 113.460 | 117.625 |
| Adjusted defence | 106.6169 | 104.1110 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.8140 | 71.0121 |
| Raw offence | 111.879 | 117.619 |
| Raw defence | 110.2261 | 104.098 |
| Effective FG% | 52.9%110 | 55.5%30 |
| Turnover rate | 13.8%54 | 14.6%110 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 79.4%247 | 116.1%101 |
| Free-throw rate | 36.7%139 | 40.9%50 |
| Opponent eFG% | 52.6%245 | 49.5%81 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 14.2%267 | 14.4%249 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 23.6%91 | 3.4%204 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 36.6%226 | 32.1%110 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 35.2%265 | 46.6%37 |
| Raw tempo | 72.372 | 71.694 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.