Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Alabama change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Minnesota change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make Alabama a 9.5-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Alabama it is +12.9, at Minnesota +6.1 (from Alabama's side).

Neutral
+9.5
70.2 poss.
At Alabama
+12.9
70.2 poss.
At Minnesota
+6.1
70.2 poss.

Margins are from Alabama's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricAlabamaMinnesota
Adjusted efficiency margin+20.418+6.988
Adjusted offence121.65109.2124
Adjusted defence101.351102.366
Adjusted tempo75.2865.2356
Raw offence119.37108.2146
Raw defence107.6199105.6136
Effective FG%55.2%3553.9%70
Turnover rate12.4%1215.3%166
Offensive rebound rate125.0%7883.8%224
Free-throw rate36.0%15235.8%159
Opponent eFG%49.2%7251.9%203
Opponent turnover rate12.1%35415.3%194
Defensive rebound rate-10.7%23934.5%40
Opponent free-throw rate32.0%10426.9%23
Three-point attempt rate54.4%147.2%31
Raw tempo76.6664.7361

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.