Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Auburn change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Auburn a 4.0-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Utah Valley it is -0.6, at Auburn -7.4 (from Utah Valley's side).
- Neutral
- -4.0
- 70.5 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- -0.6
- 70.5 poss.
- At Auburn
- -7.4
- 70.5 poss.
Margins are from Utah Valley's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Utah Valley |  Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +7.981 | +13.544 |
| Adjusted offence | 109.8108 | 118.419 |
| Adjusted defence | 102.059 | 104.9125 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.8138 | 70.2168 |
| Raw offence | 109.2127 | 116.134 |
| Raw defence | 99.029 | 110.8284 |
| Effective FG% | 54.9%40 | 53.0%103 |
| Turnover rate | 18.9%350 | 13.9%60 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 160.1%42 | 160.4%41 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.3%95 | 43.3%17 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.4%77 | 53.7%288 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 19.8%6 | 15.3%193 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -78.1%333 | -119.3%345 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.2%287 | 34.3%161 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 32.9%317 | 40.2%163 |
| Raw tempo | 71.3106 | 71.3105 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.