Skip to content
Compare CBB Teams
CBB

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: UT Rio Grande Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
AkronAlabamaArizonaArizona StateArkansasAuburnBaylorBelmontBoise StateButlerBYUCaliforniaCincinnatiClemsonColoradoColorado StateCreightonDaytonDukeEast Tennessee StateFloridaFlorida StateGeorge MasonGeorge WashingtonGeorgetownGeorgiaGonzagaGrand CanyonHigh PointHofstraHoustonIllinoisIllinois StateIndianaIowaIowa StateKansasKentuckyLibertyLouisvilleLSUMcNeeseMiamiMiami (OH)MichiganMichigan StateMinnesotaMissouriMurray StateNC StateNebraskaNevadaNew MexicoNorth CarolinaNorthern IowaNorthwesternOhio StateOklahomaOklahoma StateOle MissProvidencePurdueSaint LouisSaint Mary'sSan Diego StateSanta ClaraSeton HallSMUSouth FloridaSt. John'sSt. Thomas-MinnesotaStanfordStephen F. AustinSyracuseTCUTennesseeTexasTexas A&MTexas TechTulsaUCFUCLAUConnUNC WilmingtonUSCUT Rio Grande ValleyUtah StateUtah ValleyVanderbiltVCUVillanovaVirginiaVirginia TechWake ForestWashingtonWest VirginiaWichita StateWisconsinWyomingYale
Team 2: High Point change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
AkronAlabamaArizonaArizona StateArkansasAuburnBaylorBelmontBoise StateButlerBYUCaliforniaCincinnatiClemsonColoradoColorado StateCreightonDaytonDukeEast Tennessee StateFloridaFlorida StateGeorge MasonGeorge WashingtonGeorgetownGeorgiaGonzagaGrand CanyonHigh PointHofstraHoustonIllinoisIllinois StateIndianaIowaIowa StateKansasKentuckyLibertyLouisvilleLSUMcNeeseMiamiMiami (OH)MichiganMichigan StateMinnesotaMissouriMurray StateNC StateNebraskaNevadaNew MexicoNorth CarolinaNorthern IowaNorthwesternOhio StateOklahomaOklahoma StateOle MissProvidencePurdueSaint LouisSaint Mary'sSan Diego StateSanta ClaraSeton HallSMUSouth FloridaSt. John'sSt. Thomas-MinnesotaStanfordStephen F. AustinSyracuseTCUTennesseeTexasTexas A&MTexas TechTulsaUCFUCLAUConnUNC WilmingtonUSCUT Rio Grande ValleyUtah StateUtah ValleyVanderbiltVCUVillanovaVirginiaVirginia TechWake ForestWashingtonWest VirginiaWichita StateWisconsinWyomingYale

On a neutral floor the ratings make High Point a 3.3-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at UT Rio Grande Valley it is +0.1, at High Point -6.7 (from UT Rio Grande Valley's side).

Neutral
-3.3
70.7 poss.
At UT Rio Grande Valley
+0.1
70.7 poss.
At High Point
-6.7
70.7 poss.

Margins are from UT Rio Grande Valley's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricUT Rio Grande ValleyHigh Point
Adjusted efficiency margin+6.094+10.760
Adjusted offence109.2123115.150
Adjusted defence103.287104.4115
Adjusted tempo69.222972.358
Raw offence109.2125118.514
Raw defence101.558100.441
Effective FG%54.7%4454.5%51
Turnover rate16.7%26112.3%8
Offensive rebound rate—78.6%250
Free-throw rate28.9%32940.4%56
Opponent eFG%47.8%3650.8%143
Opponent turnover rate15.2%20520.0%5
Defensive rebound rate-201.0%35114.5%147
Opponent free-throw rate39.0%28235.2%187
Three-point attempt rate43.7%9443.8%91
Raw tempo68.425572.756

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.