Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: West Virginia change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Hofstra change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make West Virginia a 0.9-point favourite at about 67 possessions; at West Virginia it is +4.1, at Hofstra -2.3 (from West Virginia's side).
- Neutral
- +0.9
- 66.6 poss.
- At West Virginia
- +4.1
- 66.6 poss.
- At Hofstra
- -2.3
- 66.6 poss.
Margins are from West Virginia's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  West Virginia |  Hofstra |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +10.858 | +9.666 |
| Adjusted offence | 108.5136 | 111.979 |
| Adjusted defence | 97.720 | 102.367 |
| Adjusted tempo | 65.8352 | 67.3313 |
| Raw offence | 106.5181 | 111.977 |
| Raw defence | 99.232 | 101.254 |
| Effective FG% | 51.6%165 | 51.4%176 |
| Turnover rate | 15.5%183 | 14.5%99 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 109.5%124 | 74.3%270 |
| Free-throw rate | 35.4%168 | 31.6%262 |
| Opponent eFG% | 48.6%52 | 46.3%13 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.6%108 | 13.7%310 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -18.5%263 | 30.5%60 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 29.2%46 | 35.1%184 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 42.9%118 | 42.8%119 |
| Raw tempo | 66.4332 | 67.1306 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.