Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Tennessee change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Louisville change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Tennessee a 0.6-point favourite at about 69 possessions; at Tennessee it is +3.9, at Louisville -2.8 (from Tennessee's side).
- Neutral
- +0.6
- 69.4 poss.
- At Tennessee
- +3.9
- 69.4 poss.
- At Louisville
- -2.8
- 69.4 poss.
Margins are from Tennessee's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Tennessee |  Louisville |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +21.812 | +21.015 |
| Adjusted offence | 117.330 | 119.213 |
| Adjusted defence | 95.412 | 98.223 |
| Adjusted tempo | 67.3315 | 71.591 |
| Raw offence | 115.143 | 117.523 |
| Raw defence | 101.051 | 100.845 |
| Effective FG% | 51.6%167 | 56.4%20 |
| Turnover rate | 16.0%213 | 16.2%228 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 133.9%66 | 89.4%200 |
| Free-throw rate | 37.7%110 | 33.8%218 |
| Opponent eFG% | 47.8%37 | 48.0%39 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 14.7%228 | 15.8%162 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -1731.3%362 | 23.0%95 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 36.2%214 | 32.2%112 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 32.3%326 | 53.2%4 |
| Raw tempo | 69.4208 | 72.371 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.