Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: SMU change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make SMU a 0.5-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at SMU it is +3.9, at Tulsa -2.9 (from SMU's side).
- Neutral
- +0.5
- 70.8 poss.
- At SMU
- +3.9
- 70.8 poss.
- At Tulsa
- -2.9
- 70.8 poss.
Margins are from SMU's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  SMU |  Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +14.239 | +13.543 |
| Adjusted offence | 117.527 | 117.625 |
| Adjusted defence | 103.390 | 104.1110 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.7149 | 71.0121 |
| Raw offence | 116.133 | 117.619 |
| Raw defence | 107.3186 | 104.098 |
| Effective FG% | 55.9%23 | 55.5%30 |
| Turnover rate | 14.6%111 | 14.6%110 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 102.7%150 | 116.1%101 |
| Free-throw rate | 30.8%285 | 40.9%50 |
| Opponent eFG% | 51.5%178 | 49.5%81 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 15.7%174 | 14.4%249 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -0.6%216 | 3.4%204 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 32.1%109 | 32.1%110 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 35.8%254 | 46.6%37 |
| Raw tempo | 72.848 | 71.694 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.