Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Houston change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: McNeese change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Houston a 9.0-point favourite at about 68 possessions; at Houston it is +12.3, at McNeese +5.7 (from Houston's side).
- Neutral
- +9.0
- 67.7 poss.
- At Houston
- +12.3
- 67.7 poss.
- At McNeese
- +5.7
- 67.7 poss.
Margins are from Houston's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Houston |  McNeese |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +25.56 | +12.249 |
| Adjusted offence | 117.231 | 112.769 |
| Adjusted defence | 91.74 | 100.544 |
| Adjusted tempo | 65.9350 | 69.6203 |
| Raw offence | 115.340 | 112.968 |
| Raw defence | 94.34 | 99.130 |
| Effective FG% | 51.9%149 | 50.7%206 |
| Turnover rate | 11.5%1 | 13.1%23 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 83.0%229 | 144.3%51 |
| Free-throw rate | 26.1%355 | 37.4%118 |
| Opponent eFG% | 46.7%17 | 49.3%75 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 19.4%12 | 22.0%1 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 3.9%200 | -58.6%318 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 38.9%281 | 42.1%323 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 40.9%150 | 35.2%266 |
| Raw tempo | 66.6323 | 68.1268 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.