Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Vanderbilt change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: St. John's change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Vanderbilt a 1.2-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Vanderbilt it is +4.6, at St. John's -2.2 (from Vanderbilt's side).
- Neutral
- +1.2
- 71.3 poss.
- At Vanderbilt
- +4.6
- 71.3 poss.
- At St. John's
- -2.2
- 71.3 poss.
Margins are from Vanderbilt's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Vanderbilt |  St. John's |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +22.411 | +20.717 |
| Adjusted offence | 121.37 | 115.346 |
| Adjusted defence | 99.027 | 94.710 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.4161 | 72.359 |
| Raw offence | 119.56 | 111.681 |
| Raw defence | 104.099 | 97.216 |
| Effective FG% | 55.3%34 | 51.2%188 |
| Turnover rate | 12.4%11 | 13.6%45 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 73.1%282 | 94.3%179 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.1%101 | 40.8%53 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.0%65 | 47.5%31 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.5%116 | 17.6%53 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 34.1%41 | -5.0%230 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.5%292 | 31.4%95 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 44.2%86 | 35.2%267 |
| Raw tempo | 72.181 | 72.275 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.