Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Vanderbilt change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Dayton change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Vanderbilt a 8.3-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Vanderbilt it is +11.7, at Dayton +4.9 (from Vanderbilt's side).
- Neutral
- +8.3
- 69.8 poss.
- At Vanderbilt
- +11.7
- 69.8 poss.
- At Dayton
- +4.9
- 69.8 poss.
Margins are from Vanderbilt's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Vanderbilt |  Dayton |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +22.411 | +10.562 |
| Adjusted offence | 121.37 | 109.8105 |
| Adjusted defence | 99.027 | 99.334 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.4161 | 69.3216 |
| Raw offence | 119.56 | 108.7134 |
| Raw defence | 104.099 | 99.736 |
| Effective FG% | 55.3%34 | 51.3%182 |
| Turnover rate | 12.4%11 | 15.4%175 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 73.1%282 | 101.2%156 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.1%101 | 46.6%1 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.0%65 | 50.8%138 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.5%116 | 19.5%11 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 34.1%41 | 6.7%183 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.5%292 | 34.3%160 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 44.2%86 | 40.5%158 |
| Raw tempo | 72.181 | 69.0227 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.