Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Vanderbilt change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: UCF change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Vanderbilt a 9.7-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Vanderbilt it is +13.1, at UCF +6.2 (from Vanderbilt's side).
- Neutral
- +9.7
- 71.2 poss.
- At Vanderbilt
- +13.1
- 71.2 poss.
- At UCF
- +6.2
- 71.2 poss.
Margins are from Vanderbilt's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Vanderbilt |  UCF |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +22.411 | +8.877 |
| Adjusted offence | 121.37 | 114.256 |
| Adjusted defence | 99.027 | 105.4137 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.4161 | 71.973 |
| Raw offence | 119.56 | 111.191 |
| Raw defence | 104.099 | 108.8229 |
| Effective FG% | 55.3%34 | 52.6%122 |
| Turnover rate | 12.4%11 | 15.2%151 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 73.1%282 | 112.9%113 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.1%101 | 30.5%295 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.0%65 | 52.1%222 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.5%116 | 14.6%241 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 34.1%41 | -23.5%269 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.5%292 | 34.9%180 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 44.2%86 | 34.8%278 |
| Raw tempo | 72.181 | 72.466 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.