Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Vanderbilt change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: San Diego State change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Vanderbilt a 7.5-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Vanderbilt it is +10.9, at San Diego State +4.0 (from Vanderbilt's side).
- Neutral
- +7.5
- 71.1 poss.
- At Vanderbilt
- +10.9
- 71.1 poss.
- At San Diego State
- +4.0
- 71.1 poss.
Margins are from Vanderbilt's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Vanderbilt |  San Diego State |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +22.411 | +11.851 |
| Adjusted offence | 121.37 | 109.8109 |
| Adjusted defence | 99.027 | 97.922 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.4161 | 71.880 |
| Raw offence | 119.56 | 108.0149 |
| Raw defence | 104.099 | 100.440 |
| Effective FG% | 55.3%34 | 52.9%108 |
| Turnover rate | 12.4%11 | 16.3%240 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 73.1%282 | 303.4%14 |
| Free-throw rate | 38.1%101 | 39.0%80 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.0%65 | 48.5%51 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.5%116 | 18.5%29 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 34.1%41 | -95.3%338 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 39.5%292 | 38.2%264 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 44.2%86 | 33.6%304 |
| Raw tempo | 72.181 | 71.2110 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.