Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Clemson change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Clemson a 4.6-point favourite at about 68 possessions; at Clemson it is +7.9, at Utah Valley +1.3 (from Clemson's side).
- Neutral
- +4.6
- 68.4 poss.
- At Clemson
- +7.9
- 68.4 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- +1.3
- 68.4 poss.
Margins are from Clemson's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Clemson |  Utah Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +14.637 | +7.981 |
| Adjusted offence | 113.166 | 109.8108 |
| Adjusted defence | 98.525 | 102.059 |
| Adjusted tempo | 66.0345 | 70.8138 |
| Raw offence | 111.092 | 109.2127 |
| Raw defence | 101.253 | 99.029 |
| Effective FG% | 52.3%131 | 54.9%40 |
| Turnover rate | 12.7%16 | 18.9%350 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 68.3%305 | 160.1%42 |
| Free-throw rate | 37.2%125 | 38.3%95 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.0%66 | 49.4%77 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 15.9%154 | 19.8%6 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 33.8%42 | -78.1%333 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 34.2%155 | 39.2%287 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 43.3%105 | 32.9%317 |
| Raw tempo | 66.2337 | 71.3106 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.