Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Hofstra change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Purdue change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Purdue a 9.4-point favourite at about 67 possessions; at Hofstra it is -6.2, at Purdue -12.6 (from Hofstra's side).
- Neutral
- -9.4
- 67.1 poss.
- At Hofstra
- -6.2
- 67.1 poss.
- At Purdue
- -12.6
- 67.1 poss.
Margins are from Hofstra's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Hofstra |  Purdue |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +9.666 | +23.510 |
| Adjusted offence | 111.979 | 124.82 |
| Adjusted defence | 102.367 | 101.250 |
| Adjusted tempo | 67.3313 | 66.9326 |
| Raw offence | 111.977 | 122.82 |
| Raw defence | 101.254 | 107.1181 |
| Effective FG% | 51.4%176 | 57.6%9 |
| Turnover rate | 14.5%99 | 12.8%20 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 74.3%270 | 106.1%141 |
| Free-throw rate | 31.6%262 | 28.2%338 |
| Opponent eFG% | 46.3%13 | 52.5%237 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 13.7%310 | 14.7%235 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 30.5%60 | -11.9%242 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 35.1%184 | 25.8%10 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 42.8%119 | 40.4%161 |
| Raw tempo | 67.1306 | 66.3334 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.