Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Grand Canyon change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Wake Forest change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make Wake Forest a 0.6-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Grand Canyon it is +2.8, at Wake Forest -4.0 (from Grand Canyon's side).

Neutral
-0.6
70.5 poss.
At Grand Canyon
+2.8
70.5 poss.
At Wake Forest
-4.0
70.5 poss.

Margins are from Grand Canyon's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricGrand CanyonWake Forest
Adjusted efficiency margin+8.974+9.864
Adjusted offence108.3141113.659
Adjusted defence99.332103.8105
Adjusted tempo70.216971.0126
Raw offence108.6135111.093
Raw defence99.535108.2216
Effective FG%52.0%14552.4%127
Turnover rate16.6%25714.6%105
Offensive rebound rate137.0%62102.8%149
Free-throw rate39.4%6935.5%166
Opponent eFG%47.8%3851.8%198
Opponent turnover rate16.6%11216.9%94
Defensive rebound rate-44.2%2984.8%196
Opponent free-throw rate38.7%27535.2%186
Three-point attempt rate38.8%19643.7%95
Raw tempo69.619971.4104

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.