Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Grand Canyon change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Missouri change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make Missouri a 0.2-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Grand Canyon it is +3.1, at Missouri -3.5 (from Grand Canyon's side).

Neutral
-0.2
69.5 poss.
At Grand Canyon
+3.1
69.5 poss.
At Missouri
-3.5
69.5 poss.

Margins are from Grand Canyon's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricGrand CanyonMissouri
Adjusted efficiency margin+8.974+9.272
Adjusted offence108.3141113.265
Adjusted defence99.332103.9106
Adjusted tempo70.216968.9240
Raw offence108.6135112.275
Raw defence99.535108.2217
Effective FG%52.0%14555.1%39
Turnover rate16.6%25716.3%239
Offensive rebound rate137.0%62149.5%48
Free-throw rate39.4%6942.1%29
Opponent eFG%47.8%3851.4%174
Opponent turnover rate16.6%11215.7%171
Defensive rebound rate-44.2%2983.2%205
Opponent free-throw rate38.7%27535.3%193
Three-point attempt rate38.8%19636.8%234
Raw tempo69.619970.3170

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.