Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Villanova change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Hofstra change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Villanova a 3.2-point favourite at about 68 possessions; at Villanova it is +6.5, at Hofstra -0.1 (from Villanova's side).
- Neutral
- +3.2
- 67.6 poss.
- At Villanova
- +6.5
- 67.6 poss.
- At Hofstra
- -0.1
- 67.6 poss.
Margins are from Villanova's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Villanova |  Hofstra |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +14.338 | +9.666 |
| Adjusted offence | 115.347 | 111.979 |
| Adjusted defence | 101.048 | 102.367 |
| Adjusted tempo | 67.9292 | 67.3313 |
| Raw offence | 113.166 | 111.977 |
| Raw defence | 104.1103 | 101.254 |
| Effective FG% | 53.8%74 | 51.4%176 |
| Turnover rate | 13.5%37 | 14.5%99 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 108.0%131 | 74.3%270 |
| Free-throw rate | 30.9%283 | 31.6%262 |
| Opponent eFG% | 51.4%176 | 46.3%13 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 17.4%63 | 13.7%310 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -2.8%226 | 30.5%60 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 30.1%62 | 35.1%184 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 45.7%53 | 42.8%119 |
| Raw tempo | 68.4260 | 67.1306 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.