Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: UCF change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make UCF a 0.7-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at UCF it is +4.1, at Utah Valley -2.8 (from UCF's side).
- Neutral
- +0.7
- 71.4 poss.
- At UCF
- +4.1
- 71.4 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- -2.8
- 71.4 poss.
Margins are from UCF's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  UCF |  Utah Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +8.877 | +7.981 |
| Adjusted offence | 114.256 | 109.8108 |
| Adjusted defence | 105.4137 | 102.059 |
| Adjusted tempo | 71.973 | 70.8138 |
| Raw offence | 111.191 | 109.2127 |
| Raw defence | 108.8229 | 99.029 |
| Effective FG% | 52.6%122 | 54.9%40 |
| Turnover rate | 15.2%151 | 18.9%350 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 112.9%113 | 160.1%42 |
| Free-throw rate | 30.5%295 | 38.3%95 |
| Opponent eFG% | 52.1%222 | 49.4%77 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 14.6%241 | 19.8%6 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -23.5%269 | -78.1%333 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 34.9%180 | 39.2%287 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 34.8%278 | 32.9%317 |
| Raw tempo | 72.466 | 71.3106 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.