Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: SMU change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make SMU a 0.5-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Tulsa it is +2.9, at SMU -3.9 (from Tulsa's side).

Neutral
-0.5
70.8 poss.
At Tulsa
+2.9
70.8 poss.
At SMU
-3.9
70.8 poss.

Margins are from Tulsa's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricTulsaSMU
Adjusted efficiency margin+13.543+14.239
Adjusted offence117.625117.527
Adjusted defence104.1110103.390
Adjusted tempo71.012170.7149
Raw offence117.619116.133
Raw defence104.098107.3186
Effective FG%55.5%3055.9%23
Turnover rate14.6%11014.6%111
Offensive rebound rate116.1%101102.7%150
Free-throw rate40.9%5030.8%285
Opponent eFG%49.5%8151.5%178
Opponent turnover rate14.4%24915.7%174
Defensive rebound rate3.4%204-0.6%216
Opponent free-throw rate32.1%11032.1%109
Three-point attempt rate46.6%3735.8%254
Raw tempo71.69472.848

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.