Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Dayton change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Tulsa a 2.1-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Tulsa it is +5.5, at Dayton -1.2 (from Tulsa's side).
- Neutral
- +2.1
- 70.1 poss.
- At Tulsa
- +5.5
- 70.1 poss.
- At Dayton
- -1.2
- 70.1 poss.
Margins are from Tulsa's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Tulsa |  Dayton |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +13.543 | +10.562 |
| Adjusted offence | 117.625 | 109.8105 |
| Adjusted defence | 104.1110 | 99.334 |
| Adjusted tempo | 71.0121 | 69.3216 |
| Raw offence | 117.619 | 108.7134 |
| Raw defence | 104.098 | 99.736 |
| Effective FG% | 55.5%30 | 51.3%182 |
| Turnover rate | 14.6%110 | 15.4%175 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 116.1%101 | 101.2%156 |
| Free-throw rate | 40.9%50 | 46.6%1 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.5%81 | 50.8%138 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 14.4%249 | 19.5%11 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 3.4%204 | 6.7%183 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 32.1%110 | 34.3%160 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 46.6%37 | 40.5%158 |
| Raw tempo | 71.694 | 69.0227 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.