Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Auburn change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: McNeese change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Auburn a 0.9-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Auburn it is +4.3, at McNeese -2.5 (from Auburn's side).
- Neutral
- +0.9
- 69.9 poss.
- At Auburn
- +4.3
- 69.9 poss.
- At McNeese
- -2.5
- 69.9 poss.
Margins are from Auburn's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Auburn |  McNeese |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +13.544 | +12.249 |
| Adjusted offence | 118.419 | 112.769 |
| Adjusted defence | 104.9125 | 100.544 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.2168 | 69.6203 |
| Raw offence | 116.134 | 112.968 |
| Raw defence | 110.8284 | 99.130 |
| Effective FG% | 53.0%103 | 50.7%206 |
| Turnover rate | 13.9%60 | 13.1%23 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 160.4%41 | 144.3%51 |
| Free-throw rate | 43.3%17 | 37.4%118 |
| Opponent eFG% | 53.7%288 | 49.3%75 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 15.3%193 | 22.0%1 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -119.3%345 | -58.6%318 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 34.3%161 | 42.1%323 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 40.2%163 | 35.2%266 |
| Raw tempo | 71.3105 | 68.1268 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.