Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Wake Forest change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Grand Canyon change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Wake Forest a 0.6-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Wake Forest it is +4.0, at Grand Canyon -2.8 (from Wake Forest's side).
- Neutral
- +0.6
- 70.5 poss.
- At Wake Forest
- +4.0
- 70.5 poss.
- At Grand Canyon
- -2.8
- 70.5 poss.
Margins are from Wake Forest's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Wake Forest |  Grand Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +9.864 | +8.974 |
| Adjusted offence | 113.659 | 108.3141 |
| Adjusted defence | 103.8105 | 99.332 |
| Adjusted tempo | 71.0126 | 70.2169 |
| Raw offence | 111.093 | 108.6135 |
| Raw defence | 108.2216 | 99.535 |
| Effective FG% | 52.4%127 | 52.0%145 |
| Turnover rate | 14.6%105 | 16.6%257 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 102.8%149 | 137.0%62 |
| Free-throw rate | 35.5%166 | 39.4%69 |
| Opponent eFG% | 51.8%198 | 47.8%38 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 16.9%94 | 16.6%112 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 4.8%196 | -44.2%298 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 35.2%186 | 38.7%275 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 43.7%95 | 38.8%196 |
| Raw tempo | 71.4104 | 69.6199 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.