Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Minnesota change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Stephen F. Austin change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make Stephen F. Austin a 0.3-point favourite at about 67 possessions; at Minnesota it is +2.9, at Stephen F. Austin -3.6 (from Minnesota's side).

Neutral
-0.3
67.2 poss.
At Minnesota
+2.9
67.2 poss.
At Stephen F. Austin
-3.6
67.2 poss.

Margins are from Minnesota's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricMinnesotaStephen F. Austin
Adjusted efficiency margin+6.988+7.483
Adjusted offence109.2124109.5115
Adjusted defence102.366102.165
Adjusted tempo65.235669.2228
Raw offence108.2146110.4101
Raw defence105.613698.828
Effective FG%53.9%7051.7%160
Turnover rate15.3%16613.1%24
Offensive rebound rate83.8%224123.9%81
Free-throw rate35.8%15930.1%306
Opponent eFG%51.9%20347.8%34
Opponent turnover rate15.3%19416.3%126
Defensive rebound rate34.5%40-55.0%311
Opponent free-throw rate26.9%2331.1%88
Three-point attempt rate47.2%3139.8%176
Raw tempo64.736167.7286

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.