Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Michigan change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make Michigan a 16.4-point favourite at about 73 possessions; at Michigan it is +19.9, at Utah Valley +12.9 (from Michigan's side).

Neutral
+16.4
72.5 poss.
At Michigan
+19.9
72.5 poss.
At Utah Valley
+12.9
72.5 poss.

Margins are from Michigan's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricMichiganUtah Valley
Adjusted efficiency margin+30.53+7.981
Adjusted offence121.38109.8108
Adjusted defence90.82102.059
Adjusted tempo74.22170.8138
Raw offence118.811109.2127
Raw defence95.2699.029
Effective FG%58.3%854.9%40
Turnover rate15.8%20018.9%350
Offensive rebound rate248.2%18160.1%42
Free-throw rate38.1%10038.3%95
Opponent eFG%44.3%149.4%77
Opponent turnover rate14.2%27019.8%6
Defensive rebound rate-53.5%309-78.1%333
Opponent free-throw rate26.1%1539.2%287
Three-point attempt rate41.9%13632.9%317
Raw tempo73.33471.3106

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.