Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: Michigan change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Minnesota change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make Michigan a 16.4-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Michigan it is +19.8, at Minnesota +13.1 (from Michigan's side).

Neutral
+16.4
69.7 poss.
At Michigan
+19.8
69.7 poss.
At Minnesota
+13.1
69.7 poss.

Margins are from Michigan's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricMichiganMinnesota
Adjusted efficiency margin+30.53+6.988
Adjusted offence121.38109.2124
Adjusted defence90.82102.366
Adjusted tempo74.22165.2356
Raw offence118.811108.2146
Raw defence95.26105.6136
Effective FG%58.3%853.9%70
Turnover rate15.8%20015.3%166
Offensive rebound rate248.2%1883.8%224
Free-throw rate38.1%10035.8%159
Opponent eFG%44.3%151.9%203
Opponent turnover rate14.2%27015.3%194
Defensive rebound rate-53.5%30934.5%40
Opponent free-throw rate26.1%1526.9%23
Three-point attempt rate41.9%13647.2%31
Raw tempo73.33464.7361

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.