#6Zane Flores

QB·Oklahoma State·2025

Zane Flores is a Clutch Passer for Oklahoma State. Zane's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 307 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zane Flores's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

155/262 Comp/Att1454 Pass yards3 Pass TD7 INT59.2% Comp %

Rushing

117 Rush yards2 Rush TD52 Carries2.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat42
Consistency0
Clutch71

Player type

Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.23 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 0.50 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Kansas (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsUT Martin	W27-7	—	13/20	136	0	0	67.0	8	0	0.24
2	@Oregon	L3-69	25.9	7/19	67	0	2	18.8	-6	0	-0.67
4	vsTulsa	L12-19	-10.0	25/40	214	0	0	25.9	56	1	0.10
5	vsBaylor	L27-45	1.4	23/41	232	0	0	45.4	25	0	0.06
6	@Arizona	L13-41	12.0	9/20	47	0	1	26.3	31	0	-0.09
10	@Kansas	L21-38	4.1	22/28	235	2	0	74.4	-8	0	0.50
12	vsKansas State	L6-14	7.0	24/36	233	0	2	46.6	25	0	-0.04
13	@UCF	L14-17	-1.2	13/28	124	1	1	55.6	1	1	0.13
14	vsIowa State	L13-20	9.9	19/30	166	0	1	30.1	-15	0	0.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

53.5%

Passing plays

90.0%

Rushing plays

14.0%

Standard downs

47.5%

Passing downs

63.7%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.02
Passing downs: 0.18
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.10 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).