Skip to content
Zach Gibson

#7Zach Gibson

Zach Gibson is a Dual-Threat QB for Florida Atlantic.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zach Gibson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
31/53 Comp/Att323 Pass yards3 Pass TD3 INT58.5% Comp %
Rushing
3 Rush yards0 Rush TD2 Carries1.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume34
  • Dual-Threat58
  • Consistency51
  • Clutch0
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency51th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.48 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.55 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Tulsa (SP+ -10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5501.55Wk 1 vs Maryland: -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida A&M: +0.43 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs Memphis: -0.04 EPA/play5Wk 9 vs Navy: +0.54 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Tulsa: +1.55 EPA/play11Wk 14 vs East Carolina: -0.28 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@MarylandL7-390.66/13490247.7-0.02
2vsFlorida A&MW56-141/2330092.80.43
5vsMemphisL26-557.61/140026.9-0.04
9@NavyL32-426.29/14822090.7600.54
11vsTulsaW40-21-10.02/3391099.71.55
14vsEast CarolinaL3-428.012/20116013.4-30-0.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.9%
Passing plays
17.2%
Rushing plays
1.3%
Standard downs
10.5%
Passing downs
14.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.57
Passing downs
-0.21
Pass / Rush EPA
1.51 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.