Skip to content
Vandrevious Jacobs
Vandrevious Jacobs

Vandrevious Jacobs

Vandrevious Jacobs is a Versatile WR for South Carolina. Vandrevious's 2025 season produced 26.8 total EPA across 42 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Vandrevious Jacobs's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
32 Receptions548 Rec yards4 Rec TD17.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume26
  • Explosiveness68
  • Consistency57
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 1.63 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.82 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Kentucky (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8201.82Wk 2 vs South Carolina State: +1.54 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Vanderbilt: +1.24 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Missouri: +1.32 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kentucky: +1.82 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs LSU: -0.76 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma: -0.51 EPA/play8Wk 12 vs Texas A&M: -0.24 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Clemson: +0.91 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2vsSouth Carolina StateW38-1045714.31351.54
3vsVanderbiltL7-3120.323015.00201.24
4@MissouriL20-2914.4712818.31491.32
5vsKentuckyW35-131.8510821.60591.82
7@LSUL10-2010.32189.0016-0.76
8vsOklahomaL7-2618.3122.002-0.51
12@Texas A&ML30-3120.746416.0150-0.24
14vsClemsonL14-289.5714120.11740.91

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.0%
Passing plays
17.5%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
9.1%
Passing downs
8.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.99
Passing downs
0.07
Pass / Rush EPA
0.64 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.