Skip to content
Tyler Hughes

#6Tyler Hughes

Tyler Hughes is a Dual-Threat QB for Wyoming. Tyler's 2026 season produced 4.2 total EPA across 30 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tyler Hughes's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
12/19 Comp/Att130 Pass yards0 Pass TD3 INT63.2% Comp %
Rushing
52 Rush yards1 Rush TD11 Carries4.7 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

16
Attempts
7.6y
Avg depth
7.2y
After catch
75%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.6 yards in the air on an average throw about the median for the position. Another 7.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
2
0% · 0y
1
100% · 29y
1
0% · 0y
short
1
100% · 7y
3
67% · 28y
8
100% · 66y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat93
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch49
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2800.28Wk 1 vs Colorado State: +0.14 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Colorado: +0.28 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Colorado StateL13-35-7.512/19130035210.14
2vsNorthern ColoradoW21-1318/26149202600.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.8%
Passing plays
100.0%
Rushing plays
25.4%
Standard downs
54.2%
Passing downs
52.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.17
Pass / Rush EPA
0.11 / 0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.