Skip to content
Trayvon Rudolph

#9Trayvon Rudolph

Trayvon Rudolph is a Versatile WR for Toledo. Trayvon's 2025 season produced 22.9 total EPA across 48 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Trayvon Rudolph's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
39 Receptions435 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.2 Yards/rec
Returns
18 Kick returns374 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume18
  • Explosiveness28
  • Consistency46
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency46th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 2.29 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Kent State (SP+ -19).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.2902.29Wk 1 vs Kentucky: +0.39 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Kentucky: -0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Morgan State: +0.23 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Western Michigan: -0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Akron: +0.52 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Bowling Green: +0.46 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kent State: +2.29 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Washington State: +0.38 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Northern Illinois: -0.17 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Miami (OH): +0.24 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ball State: +0.68 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Central Michigan: -0.25 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@KentuckyL16-241.83279.00200.39
2vsWestern KentuckyW45-211.622110.5013-0.15
3vsMorgan StateW60-022914.50160.23
4@Western MichiganL13-14-1.4177.007-0.26
5vsAkronW45-3-13.944110.30170.52
7@Bowling GreenL23-28-12.65448.80170.46
8vsKent StateW45-10-19.3511923.81582.29
9@Washington StateL7-283.86457.50120.38
11vsNorthern IllinoisW42-3-16.7284.004-0.17
12@Miami (OH)W24-3-3.444010.00320.24
13vsBall StateW38-9-23.022613.01140.68
14@Central MichiganW21-3-8.82168.0010-0.25
20vsLouisvilleL22-2712.411212.0012

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.2%
Passing plays
12.6%
Rushing plays
0.7%
Standard downs
5.9%
Passing downs
6.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
0.70
Pass / Rush EPA
0.51 / -0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.