Skip to content
Skyler Bell

#1Skyler Bell

WR·UConn·2025

Skyler Bell is a Versatile WR for UConn. Skyler's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 141 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Skyler Bell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
101 Receptions1276 Rec yards13 Rec TD12.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume51
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency76
  • Pass-Down88
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 2.20 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Central Connecticut.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.2002.20Wk 1 vs Central Connecticut: +2.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: +0.28 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Delaware: +0.28 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ball State: +0.67 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Buffalo: -0.06 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida International: +1.36 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Boston College: +0.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Rice: +0.84 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UAB: +1.39 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Duke: +0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Air Force: +0.75 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.60 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsCentral ConnecticutW59-13413533.82802.20
2@SyracuseL20-27-13.1111059.50270.28
3@DelawareL41-44-10.979213.10310.28
4vsBall StateW31-25-23.0141138.11460.67
5@BuffaloW20-17-7.56549.0125-0.06
6vsFlorida InternationalW51-10-10.566310.52181.36
8@Boston CollegeW38-23-8.51012512.51380.35
9@RiceL34-37-14.8815819.81800.84
10vsUABW38-19-15.8814918.63391.39
11vsDukeW37-346.611877.92210.36
12vsAir ForceW26-16-3.28708.80200.75
13@Florida AtlanticW48-45-8.7812515.60400.60

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.7%
Passing plays
32.0%
Rushing plays
0.6%
Standard downs
16.0%
Passing downs
21.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.53
Passing downs
0.76
Pass / Rush EPA
0.64 / -0.75

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.