Skip to content
Rodney Fields Jr.
Rodney Fields Jr.

#20Rodney Fields Jr.

Rodney Fields Jr. is a Pass-Catching Back for Oklahoma State. Rodney's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 149 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rodney Fields Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
614 Rush yards1 Rush TD124 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions276 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume78
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency15
  • Receiving82
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency15th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.11 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Cincinnati (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6000.60Wk 2 vs Oregon: -0.20 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Tulsa: -0.09 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Baylor: +0.34 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arizona: -0.06 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Houston: +0.45 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Cincinnati: +0.60 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kansas: -0.11 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Kansas State: +0.05 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UCF: -0.11 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2@OregonL3-6925.910303.00-0.20
4vsTulsaL12-19-10.0171136.606390-0.09
5vsBaylorL27-451.45397.8057500.34
6@ArizonaL13-4112.09313.403110-0.06
7vsHoustonL17-397.414443.1026310.45
8vsCincinnatiL17-494.5211637.8132700.60
10@KansasL21-384.115563.70330-0.11
12vsKansas StateL6-147.014513.6044600.05
13@UCFL14-17-1.219874.602120-0.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.2%
Passing plays
12.2%
Rushing plays
42.4%
Standard downs
30.5%
Passing downs
21.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.22
Pass / Rush EPA
0.17 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.