Skip to content
Raphael Williams
Raphael Williams

Raphael Williams

Raphael Williams is a Versatile WR for Pittsburgh. Raphael's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 76 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Raphael Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
52 Receptions741 Rec yards7 Rec TD14.3 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Punt returns9 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume26
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency53
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.42 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.27 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Florida State (SP+ 7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2701.27Wk 1 vs Duquesne: +0.94 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Central Michigan: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs West Virginia: +0.75 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Louisville: +0.56 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Boston College: -0.28 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida State: +1.27 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Syracuse: -0.18 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs NC State: +0.55 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Stanford: +0.55 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Notre Dame: -1.04 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia Tech: +0.57 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Miami: +0.36 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsDuquesneW61-914545.00450.94
2vsCentral MichiganW45-17-8.8612120.22480.44
3@West VirginiaL24-31-6.8611919.81670.75
5vsLouisvilleL27-3412.445714.31380.56
6vsBoston CollegeW48-7-8.52189.0015-0.28
7@Florida StateW34-317.267813.00211.27
8@SyracuseW30-13-13.13289.3015-0.18
9vsNC StateW53-344.856212.41220.55
10@StanfordW35-20-11.84379.31180.55
12vsNotre DameL15-3724.43144.708-1.04
13@Georgia TechW42-289.323919.50200.57
14vsMiamiL7-3820.756613.20380.36
20vsEast CarolinaL17-238.055711.4122

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.1%
Passing plays
16.3%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
7.9%
Passing downs
11.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.72
Pass / Rush EPA
0.52 / -0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.