Skip to content
Quincy Skinner Jr.
Quincy Skinner Jr.

#3Quincy Skinner Jr.

Quincy Skinner Jr. is a Versatile WR for Vanderbilt. Quincy's 2024 season produced 30.5 total EPA across 34 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Quincy Skinner Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
29 Receptions367 Rec yards3 Rec TD12.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume13
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency76
  • Pass-Down83
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.33 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.02 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Georgia State (SP+ -18).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.0202.02Wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: +1.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Alcorn State: +0.80 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia State: +2.02 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Missouri: +1.11 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Alabama: +0.37 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kentucky: +0.38 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ball State: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas: +0.68 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Auburn: +0.82 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs South Carolina: +0.68 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs LSU: +1.69 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tennessee: -0.44 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsVirginia TechW34-2710.047218.01311.45
2vsAlcorn StateW55-02147.0090.80
3@Georgia StateL32-36-17.923718.50202.02
4@MissouriL27-3014.0199.0091.11
6vsAlabamaW40-3525.033812.70200.37
7@KentuckyW20-135.52147.00100.38
8vsBall StateW24-14-19.822311.50150.26
9vsTexasL24-2724.13217.0090.68
10@AuburnW17-79.523015.00220.82
11vsSouth CarolinaL7-2816.93268.70120.68
13@LSUL17-2415.937224.01631.69
14vsTennesseeL23-3622.0144.004-0.44
20vsGeorgia TechW35-271.9177.017

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.4%
Passing plays
10.3%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
4.3%
Passing downs
4.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.83
Passing downs
1.03
Pass / Rush EPA
0.91 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.