Skip to content
Nick Poulos

#8Nick Poulos

QB·Ohio·2025

Nick Poulos is a Dual-Threat QB for Ohio.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nick Poulos's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
4/8 Comp/Att19 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
34 Rush yards0 Rush TD8 Carries4.3 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

31
Attempts
12.7y
Avg depth
6.3y
After catch
45%
Catch rate

The ball travels 12.7 yards in the air on an average throw 4.9 yards deeper than the median. Another 6.3 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
2
50% · 20y
1
0% · 0y
4
0% · 0y
short
9
33% · 26y
3
100% · 93y
12
58% · 25y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume22
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency51
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency51th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 2.96 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.9602.96Wk 3 vs Ohio State: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb: +2.96 EPA/play4Wk 13 vs Massachusetts: -0.38 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
3@Ohio StateL9-3730.14/8190061.81300.10
4vsGardner-WebbW52-351902.96
13vsMassachusettsW42-14-36.620-0.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.7%
Passing plays
14.5%
Rushing plays
4.6%
Standard downs
6.9%
Passing downs
10.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.05
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.09 / 0.69

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Nick Poulos Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Ohio · Gridpex