Skip to content
Marcus Beamon

#10Marcus Beamon

Marcus Beamon is a Clutch Passer for Central Michigan. Marcus's 2025 season produced 2.4 total EPA across 36 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marcus Beamon's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
2/4 Comp/Att35 Pass yards1 Pass TD0 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
88 Rush yards1 Rush TD33 Carries2.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume35
  • Dual-Threat17
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch67
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6700.67Wk 10 vs Western Michigan: +0.29 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Buffalo: -0.09 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kent State: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Toledo: -0.67 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
10@Western MichiganL21-24-1.41/1331066.61900.29
12vsBuffaloW38-19-7.50/10007.4291-0.09
13@Kent StateW28-16-19.31/220094.24200.23
14vsToledoL3-216.0-20-0.67
20vsNorthwesternL7-345.800

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.3%
Passing plays
3.4%
Rushing plays
19.4%
Standard downs
13.9%
Passing downs
8.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.04
Passing downs
0.17
Pass / Rush EPA
0.73 / -0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.