Skip to content
London Humphreys
London Humphreys

#16London Humphreys

London Humphreys is a Versatile WR for Georgia.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So London Humphreys's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
18 Receptions276 Rec yards3 Rec TD15.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume9
  • Explosiveness56
  • Consistency73
  • Pass-Down32
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.16 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.46 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Texas (SP+ 16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.4602.46Wk 1 vs Marshall: +0.52 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Austin Peay: +0.12 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tennessee: +1.81 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Alabama: +1.39 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kentucky: +0.84 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Auburn: +2.39 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ole Miss: +0.54 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Florida: -0.05 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Mississippi State: +0.12 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Texas: +2.46 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsMarshallW45-7-4.5382.7140.52
2vsAustin PeayW28-63299.70160.12
3@TennesseeW44-4115.025929.51311.81
5vsAlabamaL21-2414.8199.0091.39
6vsKentuckyW35-141.823517.50180.84
7@AuburnW20-1011.622512.50172.39
8vsOle MissW43-3524.022010.00110.54
10vsFloridaW24-203.5-0.05
11@Mississippi StateW41-214.113636.00360.12
12vsTexasW35-1016.225527.51302.46

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.1%
Passing plays
6.8%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
2.9%
Passing downs
3.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.65
Passing downs
0.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.60 / 0.86

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
London Humphreys Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Georgia · Gridpex