#10LaJohntay Wester

WR·Colorado·2024

LaJohntay Wester is a Versatile WR for Colorado. LaJohntay's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 73 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So LaJohntay Wester's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving

74 Receptions931 Rec yards10 Rec TD12.6 Yards/rec

Returns

2 Kick returns14 KR yards0 KR TD9 Punt returns108 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume27
Explosiveness37
Consistency84
Pass-Down98

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.43 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.99 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Colorado State (SP+ -6).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsNorth Dakota State	W31-26	—	5	58	11.6	0	25	0.45
2	@Nebraska	L10-28	5.5	4	20	5.0	1	14	0.72
3	@Colorado State	W28-9	-5.7	5	80	16.0	2	34	1.99
4	vsBaylor	W38-31	8.4	4	68	17.0	1	43	1.56
5	@UCF	W48-21	2.8	3	34	11.3	1	23	1.18
7	vsKansas State	L28-31	14.1	5	58	11.6	2	25	1.94
8	@Arizona	W34-7	-2.8	8	127	15.9	0	46	1.53
9	vsCincinnati	W34-23	-0.1	5	56	11.2	0	28	0.37
11	@Texas Tech	W41-27	4.3	6	82	13.7	1	23	1.63
12	vsUtah	W49-24	7.7	10	77	7.7	0	18	0.50
13	vsKansas	L21-37	4.9	4	45	11.3	0	27	0.23
14	vsOklahoma State	W52-0	-2.6	11	175	15.9	2	69	1.66
20	vsBYU	L14-36	15.3	4	51	12.8	0	25	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

9.6%

Passing plays

15.1%

Rushing plays

0.3%

Standard downs

8.6%

Passing downs

11.9%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.94
Passing downs: 1.24
Pass / Rush EPA: 1.09 / -1.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).