Skip to content
Kirby Vorhees

#9Kirby Vorhees

Kirby Vorhees is a Committee Back for Washington State. Kirby's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 157 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kirby Vorhees's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
576 Rush yards5 Rush TD138 Carries4.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
19 Receptions125 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume61
  • Explosiveness24
  • Consistency29
  • Receiving57
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency29th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.46 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Washington (SP+ 18).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4600.46Wk 1 vs Idaho: -0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs San Diego State: -0.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs North Texas: -0.05 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Washington: +0.46 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado State: -0.17 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Ole Miss: +0.36 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Virginia: -0.06 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Toledo: +0.36 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Oregon State: +0.15 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.11 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs James Madison: -0.00 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon State: +0.02 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsIdahoW13-106193.205180-0.13
2vsSan Diego StateW36-136.713675.20-0.04
3@North TexasL10-5913.86335.502-10-0.05
4vsWashingtonL24-5918.45132.6021600.46
5@Colorado StateW20-3-15.68243.003190-0.17
7@Ole MissL21-2424.010888.811200.36
8@VirginiaL20-2211.116452.801100-0.06
9vsToledoW28-76.015624.110.36
10@Oregon StateL7-10-15.910464.6122400.15
12vsLouisiana TechW28-3-1.316764.8121200.11
13@James MadisonL20-2412.319613.20-0.00
14vsOregon StateW32-8-15.914423.0112500.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
21.2%
Passing plays
6.6%
Rushing plays
36.1%
Standard downs
25.4%
Passing downs
12.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.04
Passing downs
0.12
Pass / Rush EPA
0.12 / 0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.