Skip to content
Kiefer Sibley

#21Kiefer Sibley

Kiefer Sibley is a Pass-Catching Back for New Mexico.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kiefer Sibley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
93 Rush yards1 Rush TD12 Carries7.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
3 Receptions8 Rec yards0 Rec TD2.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume30
  • Explosiveness96
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Peak game: 0.36 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Mercyhurst.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3600.36Wk 1 vs Central Michigan: -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Mercyhurst: +0.36 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsCentral MichiganW38-7-20.08455.60130-0.02
2vsMercyhurstW70-744812.012500.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.4%
Passing plays
6.5%
Rushing plays
12.8%
Standard downs
10.1%
Passing downs
11.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.19
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.60 / 0.36

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.