Skip to content
Kevin Coleman Jr.
Kevin Coleman Jr.

#3Kevin Coleman Jr.

Kevin Coleman Jr. is a Slot Specialist WR for Missouri. Kevin's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 93 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kevin Coleman Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
66 Receptions732 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.1 Yards/rec
Returns
15 Punt returns189 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume29
  • Explosiveness27
  • Consistency52
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency52th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.33 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Vanderbilt (SP+ 20).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3301.33Wk 1 vs Central Arkansas: +0.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas: +1.27 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisiana: +0.63 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Carolina: +0.04 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Massachusetts: +0.58 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Alabama: -0.79 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Auburn: +0.74 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Vanderbilt: +1.33 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Texas A&M: -0.71 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Mississippi State: +0.41 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oklahoma: +0.16 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Arkansas: +0.56 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsCentral ArkansasW61-66488.00200.45
2vsKansasW42-314.11012612.61501.27
3vsLouisianaW52-10-10.188410.50200.63
4vsSouth CarolinaW29-205.93206.70120.04
5vsMassachusettsW42-6-36.6121089.00170.58
7vsAlabamaL24-2714.8122.002-0.79
8@AuburnW23-1711.646115.30200.74
9@VanderbiltL10-1720.3710915.60361.33
11vsTexas A&ML17-3820.7111.001-0.71
12vsMississippi StateW49-274.144110.30170.41
13@OklahomaL6-1718.3711516.40370.16
14@ArkansasW31-175.10.56
20vsVirginiaL7-1311.13175.7011

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.0%
Passing plays
21.8%
Rushing plays
1.7%
Standard downs
8.1%
Passing downs
14.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.88
Pass / Rush EPA
0.59 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.