Skip to content
Keshaun Singleton
Keshaun Singleton

#11Keshaun Singleton

Keshaun Singleton is a Versatile WR for South Florida. Keshaun's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 69 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Keshaun Singleton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
50 Receptions877 Rec yards8 Rec TD17.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.37 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.98 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs UTSA (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.9802.98Wk 1 vs Boise State: +1.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida: +1.68 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Miami: +0.95 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Carolina State: +0.23 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Charlotte: -0.53 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs North Texas: +0.82 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.83 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Memphis: +1.00 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs UTSA: +2.98 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Navy: +0.51 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UAB: +0.80 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Rice: +0.68 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsBoise StateW34-73.159318.61451.40
2@FloridaW18-163.527537.51661.68
3@MiamiL12-4920.723919.50260.95
4vsSouth Carolina StateW63-144287.0090.23
6vsCharlotteW54-26-26.7155.005-0.53
7@North TexasW63-3613.835418.01290.82
8vsFlorida AtlanticW48-13-8.756913.80390.83
9@MemphisL31-347.678812.60151.00
11vsUTSAW55-233.7412230.52422.98
12@NavyL38-416.258617.21520.51
13@UABW48-18-15.869315.50440.80
14vsRiceW52-3-14.8612520.82470.68

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.6%
Passing plays
19.1%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
8.4%
Passing downs
9.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.70
Passing downs
1.19
Pass / Rush EPA
0.88 / -1.66

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.