Skip to content
Joseph Manjack

Joseph Manjack

WR·TCU·2025

Joseph Manjack is a Versatile WR for TCU. Joseph's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 65 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Joseph Manjack's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
44 Receptions579 Rec yards3 Rec TD13.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness41
  • Consistency65
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency65th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.12 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.29 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Iowa State (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.2902.29Wk 1 vs North Carolina: +0.81 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Abilene Christian: +2.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs SMU: -0.16 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Arizona State: +0.74 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Colorado: +0.34 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas State: -0.33 EPA/play7Wk 11 vs Iowa State: +2.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs BYU: +0.62 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Houston: +0.41 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Cincinnati: +0.20 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@North CarolinaW48-14-6.622412.00180.81
3vsAbilene ChristianW42-21411428.50512.08
4vsSMUW35-2413.43155.016-0.16
5@Arizona StateL24-273.968313.80320.74
6vsColoradoW35-21-8.356513.01250.34
7@Kansas StateL28-417.0188.008-0.33
11vsIowa StateL17-209.934816.00222.29
12@BYUL13-4415.934013.30190.62
13@HoustonW17-147.499510.60220.41
14vsCincinnatiW45-234.555911.81440.20
20vsUSCW30-2716.93289.3015

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.7%
Passing plays
16.3%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
7.7%
Passing downs
10.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.31
Passing downs
0.95
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / 0.39

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.