Jordan Feuerbacher Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs TE peers

Player type

Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 1.93 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.84 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Rice (SP+ -17).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsNorthwestern State	W55-7	—	1	5	5.0	1	5	2.76
3	@Rice	W38-10	-16.5	1	22	22.0	1	22	2.84
4	vsOklahoma State	W35-24	16.4	2	50	25.0	0	36	2.34
7	vsKansas	W49-7	-15.9	1	6	6.0	0	6	0.15
9	@Texas	L34-35	10.6	1	11	11.0	0	11	0.28
11	@Oklahoma	L24-45	26.1	1	10	10.0	0	10	1.14
12	vsKansas State	L21-42	8.2	—	—	—	—	—	—

Snap-share proxy

Overall

1.6%

Passing plays

3.8%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

0.9%

Passing downs

3.3%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs Kansas StateWk 12

Rec — · Rec Yds — · Avg — · Rec TD —